Why do Large Animals Never Actuate Their Jumps with Latch-Mediated Springs? Because They can Jump Higher Without Them.

As animals get smaller, their ability to generate usable work from muscle contraction is decreased by the muscle's force-velocity properties, thereby reducing their effective jump height. Very small animals use a spring-actuated system, which prevents velocity effects from reducing available energy. Since force-velocity properties reduce the usable work in even larger animals, why don't larger animals use spring-actuated jumping systems as well? We will show that muscle length-tension properties limit spring-actuated systems to generating a maximum one-third of the possible work that a muscle could produce-greatly restricting the jumping height of spring-actuated jumpers. Thus a spring-actuated jumping animal has a jumping height that is one-third of the maximum possible jump height achievable were 100% of the possible muscle work available. Larger animals, which could theoretically use all of the available muscle energy, have a maximum jumping height that asymptotically approaches a value that is about three times higher than that of spring-actuated jumpers. Furthermore, a size related "crossover point" is evident for these two jumping mechanisms: animals smaller than this point can jump higher with a spring-actuated mechanism, while animals larger than this point can jump higher with a muscle-actuated mechanism. We demonstrate how this limit on energy storage is a consequence of the interaction between length-tension properties of muscles and spring stiffness. We indicate where this crossover point occurs based on modeling and then use jumping data from the literature to validate that larger jumping animals generate greater jump heights with muscle-actuated systems than spring-actuated systems

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physical activity loyalty scheme for behaviour change maintenance: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Increasing physical activity in the workplace can provide employee physical and mental health benefits, and employer economic benefits through reduced absenteeism and increased productivity. The workplace is an opportune setting to encourage habitual activity. However, there is limited evidence on effective behaviour change interventions that lead to maintained physical activity. This study aims to address this gap and help build the necessary evidence base for effective, and cost-effective, workplace interventions. Methods/design This cluster randomised control trial will recruit 776 office-based employees from public sector organisations in Belfast and Lisburn city centres, Northern Ireland. Participants will be randomly allocated by cluster to either the Intervention Group or Control Group (waiting list control). The 6-month intervention consists of rewards (retail vouchers, based on similar principles to high street loyalty cards), feedback and other evidence-based behaviour change techniques. Sensors situated in the vicinity of participating workplaces will promote and monitor minutes of physical activity undertaken by participants. Both groups will complete all outcome measures. The primary outcome is steps per day recorded using a pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker CW-701) for 7 consecutive days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcomes include health, mental wellbeing, quality of life, work absenteeism and presenteeism, and use of healthcare resources. Process measures will assess intervention “dose”, website usage, and intervention fidelity. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the National Health Service, employer and retailer perspective using both a cost-utility and cost-effectiveness framework. The inclusion of a discrete choice experiment will further generate values for a cost-benefit analysis. Participant focus groups will explore who the intervention worked for and why, and interviews with retailers will elucidate their views on the sustainability of a public health focused loyalty card scheme. Discussion The study is designed to maximise the potential for roll-out in similar settings, by engaging the public sector and business community in designing and delivering the intervention. We have developed a sustainable business model using a ‘points’ based loyalty platform, whereby local businesses ‘sponsor’ the incentive (retail vouchers) in return for increased footfall to their business. Trial registration ISRCTN17975376 (Registered 19/09/2014)

The early-type galaxies NGC 1407 and NGC 1400 - I: spatially resolved radial kinematics and surface photometry

This is the first paper of a series focused on investigating the star formation and evolutionary history of the two early-type galaxies NGC 1407 and NGC 1400. They are the two brightest galaxies of the NGC 1407 (or Eridanus-A) group, one of the 60 groups studied as part of the Group Evolution Multi-wavelength Study (GEMS). Here we present new high signal-to-noise long-slit spectroscopic data obtained at the ESO 3.6m telescope and high-resolution multi-band imaging data from the HST/ACS and wide-field imaging from Subaru Suprime-Cam. We spatially resolved integrated spectra out to 0.6 (NGC 1407) and 1.3 (NGC 1400) effective radii. The radial profiles of the kinematic parameters v(rot), sigma, h3 and h4 are measured. The surface brightness profiles are fitted to different galaxy light models and the colour distributions analysed. The multi-band images are modelled to derive isophotal shape parameters and residual galaxy images. The parameters from the surface brightness profile fitting are used to estimate the mass of the possible central supermassive black hole in NGC 1407. The galaxies are found to be rotationally supported and to have a flat core in the surface brightness profiles. Elliptical isophotes are observed at all radii and no fine structures are detected in the residual galaxy images. From our results we can also discard a possible interaction between NGC 1400, NGC 1407 and the group intergalactic medium. We estimate a mass of 1.03x10^9 M(sun) for the supermassive black hole in NGC 1407 galaxy.Comment: 11 pages, 6 tables, 6 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRA

Development of international consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi approach

Funding Information: This work was supported by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc . Funding Information: The content of this manuscript was based on preparatory pre-meeting activities and presentations and discussions during two advisory board meetings that were coordinated and funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. All authors or their institutions received funding from BioMarin to attend at least one or both meetings. Additional disclosures: BKB received consulting payments from BioMarin, Shire, Genzyme, Alexion, Horizon Therapeutics, Denali Therapeutics, JCR Pharma, Moderna, Aeglea BioTherapeutics, SIO Gene Therapies, Taysha Gene Therapy, Ultragenyx, and Inventiva Pharma, participated as clinical trial investigator for BioMarin, Shire, Denali Therapeutics, Homology Medicines, Ultragenyx, and Moderna as well as received speaker fees from BioMarin, Shire, Genzyme, and Horizon Therapeutics. AH received consulting payments from BioMarin, Chiesi, Shire, Genzyme, Amicus, and Ultragenyx, participated as clinical trial investigator for Ultragenyx as well as received speaker fees from Alexion, Amicus, BioMarin, Genzyme, Nutricia, Sobi, and Takeda. ABQ received consulting payments from BioMarin, speaker fees from BioMarin, Nutricia, Vitaflo, Sanofi, Takeda, Recordati, and travel support from Vitaflo . SEC received consulting payments and speaker fees from BioMarin as well as consulting payments from Synlogic Therapeutics. COH was clinical trial investigator for BioMarin and received consulting and speaker payments from BioMarin. SCJH received consulting payments and travel support from BioMarin and Homology Medicines. NL received consulting payments from Alnylam, Amicus, Astellas, BioMarin, BridgeBio, Chiesi, Genzyme/Sanofi, HemoShear, Horizon Therapeutics, Jaguar, Moderna, Nestle, PTC Therapeutics, Reneo, Shire, Synlogic, and Ultragenyx, participated as clinical trial investigator for Aeglea, Amicus, Astellas, BioMarin, Genzyme/Sanofi, Homology, Horizon, Moderna, Pfizer, Protalix, PTC Therapeutics, Reneo, Retrophin/Travere therapeutics, Shire, and Ultragenyx, as well as received speaker fees from Cycle Pharmaceuticals, Leadiant and Recordati. MCM II received consulting payments from BioMarin, Horizon Therapeutics, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Applied Therapeutics, Cycle Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx. ALSP received speaker fees from BioMarin. JCR received consulting payments from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin, Vitaflo, and Nutricia, speaker fees from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, PIAM, LifeDiet, and Nutricia, as well as travel support from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, PIAM, and Nutricia. SS received consulting payments, research grants, speaker fees, and travel support from BioMarin and participated as clinical trials investigator for BioMarin. ASV received consulting payments from BioMarin, Horizon Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx and participated as clinical trial investigator for Acadia, Alexion, BioMarin, Genzyme, Homology Medicines, Kaleido, Mallinckrodt, and Ultragenyx. JV received consulting payments from BioMarin, LogicBio Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics, Orphan Labs, Synlogic Therapeutics, Sanofi, Axcella Health, Agios Pharmaceuticals, and Applied Therapeutics as well as travel grants from BioMarin and LogicBio Pharmaceuticals. MW received consulting payments, speaker fees, and travel support from BioMarin, and participated as clinical trial investigator for Mallinckrodt, Roche, Wave, Cycle Therapeutics, and Intrabio. ACM participated in strategic advisory boards and received honoraria as a consultant and as a speaker for Merck Serono, BioMarin, Nestlé Health Science (SHS), Applied Pharma Research, Actelion, Retrophin, Censa, PTC Therapeutics, and Arla Food. Funding Information: Ideally, access to (neuro)psychological/psychiatric support should assist adolescents with identifying, understanding, and reporting of PKU-specific challenges (Table 3), offering individualized recommendations on managing these challenges. Although there is no replacement for mental health services for patients with identified needs, psychosocial support from PKU peers, e.g., through PKU camps, virtual social events, etc., can at least in the short-term help to improve metabolic control by providing individuals an opportunity to participate in supportive PKU-related educational activities potentially reducing perceived social isolation [91]. In addition to PKU camps, which may be very specific to certain regions or countries, HCPs should consider encouraging involvement in local, regional, national and international PKU patient/family advocacy and social support organizations, introducing adolescents and young adults to national/international patient registries [92,93]. Besides support from PKU peers, patients can benefit from non-PKU peer support, although some adolescents and young adults with PKU may not disclose to others and may avoid eating in with others or eating in public due to potential feelings of anxiety or feelings of being ashamed of their disease. In addition, patients with PKU of all ages, but particularly vulnerable adolescents and young adults, can benefit from having the opportunity to learn about and practice strategies that help promote feelings of empowerment and self-efficacy that can be used in both familiar and unfamiliar environments where they may experience peer pressure and feel the need to ‘fit in’. For example, a role-play approach involving behavioral rehearsal, self-monitoring, goal setting, and training in problem-solving skills with emphasis on initiation and inhibition (i.e., how to say no) could be provided by parents, PKU peers, or even members of the PKU team. These types of activities can be used to teach adolescents with PKU how to react in social situations, such as dining out, helping to avoid indulging and increased risk-taking behavior, a hallmark of the adolescent period [94].This work was supported by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.The content of this manuscript was based on preparatory pre-meeting activities and presentations and discussions during two advisory board meetings that were coordinated and funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. All authors or their institutions received funding from BioMarin to attend at least one or both meetings. Additional disclosures: BKB received consulting payments from BioMarin, Shire, Genzyme, Alexion, Horizon Therapeutics, Denali Therapeutics, JCR Pharma, Moderna, Aeglea BioTherapeutics, SIO Gene Therapies, Taysha Gene Therapy, Ultragenyx, and Inventiva Pharma, participated as clinical trial investigator for BioMarin, Shire, Denali Therapeutics, Homology Medicines, Ultragenyx, and Moderna as well as received speaker fees from BioMarin, Shire, Genzyme, and Horizon Therapeutics. AH received consulting payments from BioMarin, Chiesi, Shire, Genzyme, Amicus, and Ultragenyx, participated as clinical trial investigator for Ultragenyx as well as received speaker fees from Alexion, Amicus, BioMarin, Genzyme, Nutricia, Sobi, and Takeda. ABQ received consulting payments from BioMarin, speaker fees from BioMarin, Nutricia, Vitaflo, Sanofi, Takeda, Recordati, and travel support from Vitaflo. SEC received consulting payments and speaker fees from BioMarin as well as consulting payments from Synlogic Therapeutics. COH was clinical trial investigator for BioMarin and received consulting and speaker payments from BioMarin. SCJH received consulting payments and travel support from BioMarin and Homology Medicines. NL received consulting payments from Alnylam, Amicus, Astellas, BioMarin, BridgeBio, Chiesi, Genzyme/Sanofi, HemoShear, Horizon Therapeutics, Jaguar, Moderna, Nestle, PTC Therapeutics, Reneo, Shire, Synlogic, and Ultragenyx, participated as clinical trial investigator for Aeglea, Amicus, Astellas, BioMarin, Genzyme/Sanofi, Homology, Horizon, Moderna, Pfizer, Protalix, PTC Therapeutics, Reneo, Retrophin/Travere therapeutics, Shire, and Ultragenyx, as well as received speaker fees from Cycle Pharmaceuticals, Leadiant and Recordati. MCM II received consulting payments from BioMarin, Horizon Therapeutics, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Applied Therapeutics, Cycle Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx. ALSP received speaker fees from BioMarin. JCR received consulting payments from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin, Vitaflo, and Nutricia, speaker fees from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, PIAM, LifeDiet, and Nutricia, as well as travel support from Applied Pharma Research, Merck Serono, BioMarin, Vitaflo, Cambrooke, PIAM, and Nutricia. SS received consulting payments, research grants, speaker fees, and travel support from BioMarin and participated as clinical trials investigator for BioMarin. ASV received consulting payments from BioMarin, Horizon Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx and participated as clinical trial investigator for Acadia, Alexion, BioMarin, Genzyme, Homology Medicines, Kaleido, Mallinckrodt, and Ultragenyx. JV received consulting payments from BioMarin, LogicBio Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics, Orphan Labs, Synlogic Therapeutics, Sanofi, Axcella Health, Agios Pharmaceuticals, and Applied Therapeutics as well as travel grants from BioMarin and LogicBio Pharmaceuticals. MW received consulting payments, speaker fees, and travel support from BioMarin, and participated as clinical trial investigator for Mallinckrodt, Roche, Wave, Cycle Therapeutics, and Intrabio. ACM participated in strategic advisory boards and received honoraria as a consultant and as a speaker for Merck Serono, BioMarin, Nestlé Health Science (SHS), Applied Pharma Research, Actelion, Retrophin, Censa, PTC Therapeutics, and Arla Food. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The AuthorsBackground: Early treated patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) often become lost to follow-up from adolescence onwards due to the historical focus of PKU care on the pediatric population and lack of programs facilitating the transition to adulthood. As a result, evidence on the management of adolescents and young adults with PKU is limited. Methods: Two meetings were held with a multidisciplinary international panel of 25 experts in PKU and comorbidities frequently experienced by patients with PKU. Based on the outcomes of the first meeting, a set of statements were developed. During the second meeting, these statements were voted on for consensus generation (≥70% agreement), using a modified Delphi approach. Results: A total of 37 consensus recommendations were developed across five areas that were deemed important in the management of adolescents and young adults with PKU: (1) general physical health, (2) mental health and neurocognitive functioning, (3) blood Phe target range, (4) PKU-specific challenges, and (5) transition to adult care. The consensus recommendations reflect the personal opinions and experiences from the participating experts supported with evidence when available. Overall, clinicians managing adolescents and young adults with PKU should be aware of the wide variety of PKU-associated comorbidities, initiating screening at an early age. In addition, management of adolescents/young adults should be a joint effort between the patient, clinical center, and parents/caregivers supporting adolescents with gradually gaining independent control of their disease during the transition to adulthood. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary international group of experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop a set of consensus recommendations with the aim of providing guidance and offering tools to clinics to aid with supporting adolescents and young adults with PKU.publishersversionpublishe

The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England

Background: The aim was to estimate the prevalence of frailty and relative contribution of physical/balance, nutritive, cognitive and sensory frailty to important adverse health states (falls, physical activity levels, outdoor mobility, problems in self-care or usual activities, and lack of energy or accomplishment) in an English cohort by age and sex. Methods: Analysis of baseline data from a cohort of 9803 community-dwelling participants in a clinical trial. The sample was drawn from a random selection of all people aged 70 or more registered with 63 general practices across England. Data were collected by postal questionnaire. Frailty was measured with the Strawbridge questionnaire. We used cross sectional, multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between frailty domains and known correlates and adjusted for age. Some models were stratified by sex. Results: Mean age of participants was 78 years (sd 5.7), range 70 to 101 and 47.5% (4653/9803) were men. The prevalence of overall frailty was 20.7% (2005/9671) and there was no difference in prevalence by sex (Odds Ratio 0.98; 95% Confidence Interval 0.89 to 1.08). Sensory frailty was the most common and this was reported by more men (1823/4586) than women (1469/5056; Odds Ratio for sensory frailty 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval 0.57 to 0.68). Men were less likely than women to have physical or nutritive frailty. Physical frailty had the strongest independent associations with adverse health states. However, sensory frailty was independently associated with falls, less frequent walking, problems in self-care and usual activities, lack of energy and accomplishment. Conclusions: Physical frailty was more strongly associated with adverse health states, but sensory frailty was much more common. The health gain from intervention for sensory frailty in England is likely to be substantial, particularly for older men. Sensory frailty should be explored further as an important target of intervention to improve health outcomes for older people both at clinical and population level.This article is freely available via Open Access. Click on the Publisher URL to access it via the publisher's site.08/14/41/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom Project number 08/14/41/Health Technology Assessment Programmepre-print, post-print, publisher's version/PD

The Sediment Green-Blue Color Ratio as a Proxy for Biogenic Silica Productivity Along the Chilean Margin

Sediment cores recently collected from the Chilean Margin during D/V JOIDES Resolution Expedition 379T (JR100) document variability in shipboard-generated records of the green/blue (G/B) ratio. These changes show a strong coherence with benthic foraminiferal δ18O, Antarctic ice core records, and sediment lithology (e.g., higher diatom abundances in greener sediment intervals), suggesting a climate-related control on the G/B. Here, we test the utility of G/B as a proxy for diatom productivity at Sites J1002 and J1007 by calibrating G/B to measured biogenic opal. Strong exponential correlations between measured opal% and the G/B were found at both sites. We use the empirical regressions to generate high-resolution records of opal contents (opal%) on the Chilean Margin. Higher productivity tends to result in more reducing sedimentary conditions. Redox-sensitive sedimentary U/Th generally co-varies with the reconstructed opal% at both sites, supporting the association between sediment color, sedimentary U/Th, and productivity. Lastly, we calculated opal mass accumulation rate (MAR) at Site J1007 over the last ∼150,000 years. The G/B-derived opal MAR record from Site J1007 largely tracks existing records derived from traditional wet-alkaline digestion from the south and eastern equatorial Pacific (EEP) Ocean, with a common opal flux peak at ∼50 ka suggesting that increased diatom productivity in the EEP was likely driven by enhanced nutrient supply from the Southern Ocean rather than dust inputs as previously suggested. Collectively, our results identify the G/B ratio as a useful tool with the potential to generate reliable, high-resolution paleoceanographic records that circumvent the traditionally laborious methodology.publishedVersio

Deep submarine infiltration of altered geothermal groundwater on the south Chilean Margin

Submarine groundwater discharge is increasingly recognized as an important component of the oceanic geochemical budget, but knowledge of the distribution of this phenomenon is limited. To date, reports of meteoric inputs to marine sediments are typically limited to shallow shelf and coastal environments, whereas contributions of freshwater along deeper sections of tectonically active margins have generally been attributed to silicate diagenesis, mineral dehydration, or methane hydrate dissociation. Here, using geochemical fingerprinting of pore water data from Site J1003 recovered from the Chilean Margin during D/V JOIDES Resolution Expedition 379 T, we show that substantial offshore freshening reflects deep and focused contributions of meteorically modified geothermal groundwater, which is likely sourced from a reservoir ~2.8 km deep in the Aysén region of Patagonia and infiltrated marine sediments during or shortly after the last glacial period. Emplacement of fossil groundwaters reflects an apparently ubiquitous phenomenon in margin sediments globally, but our results now identify an unappreciated locus of deep submarine groundwater discharge along active margins with potential implications for coastal biogeochemical processes and tectonic instability.publishedVersio

Hidden in the Middle : Culture, Value and Reward in Bioinformatics

Bioinformatics - the so-called shotgun marriage between biology and computer science - is an interdiscipline. Despite interdisciplinarity being seen as a virtue, for having the capacity to solve complex problems and foster innovation, it has the potential to place projects and people in anomalous categories. For example, valorised 'outputs' in academia are often defined and rewarded by discipline. Bioinformatics, as an interdisciplinary bricolage, incorporates experts from various disciplinary cultures with their own distinct ways of working. Perceived problems of interdisciplinarity include difficulties of making explicit knowledge that is practical, theoretical, or cognitive. But successful interdisciplinary research also depends on an understanding of disciplinary cultures and value systems, often only tacitly understood by members of the communities in question. In bioinformatics, the 'parent' disciplines have different value systems; for example, what is considered worthwhile research by computer scientists can be thought of as trivial by biologists, and vice versa. This paper concentrates on the problems of reward and recognition described by scientists working in academic bioinformatics in the United Kingdom. We highlight problems that are a consequence of its cross-cultural make-up, recognising that the mismatches in knowledge in this borderland take place not just at the level of the practical, theoretical, or epistemological, but also at the cultural level too. The trend in big, interdisciplinary science is towards multiple authors on a single paper; in bioinformatics this has created hybrid or fractional scientists who find they are being positioned not just in-between established disciplines but also in-between as middle authors or, worse still, left off papers altogether

Meeting Report: Aging Research and Drug Discovery

Aging is the single largest risk factor for most chronic diseases, and thus possesses large socioeconomic interest to continuously aging societies. Consequently, the field of aging research is expanding alongside a growing focus from the industry and investors in aging research. This year's 8th Annual Aging Research and Drug Discovery ARDD) meeting was organized as a hybrid meeting from August 30th to September 3rd 2021 with more than 130 attendees participating on-site at the Ceremonial Hall at University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and 1800 engaging online. The conference comprised of presentations from 75 speakers focusing on new research in topics including mechanisms of aging and how these can be modulated as well as the use of AI and new standards of practices within aging research. This year, a longevity workshop was included to build stronger connections with the clinical community